AI Proposal Platform: Qwilr
Website: https://qwilr.com
Target Audience: Small to mid-sized AEC firms with strong core content
Best Use Case: Interactive qualifications packages and marketing documents
Overview
Qwilr is a web-based proposal and presentation tool that turns static documents into interactive, mobile-friendly webpages. Its modular structure and multimedia capabilities make it well-suited for showcasing qualifications, case studies, and fee proposals in a visually compelling format.
Key Features
Centralized Content Management
Maintains a single source of content
Supports uploading and converting PDFs into Qwilr format
Does not include AI-driven content generation or suggestion tools
AI and Automation
No AI features for parsing or drafting content
Content must be manually created and maintained
Collaboration Tools
Internal commenting system for review and feedback
No real-time editing or live collaboration
Templates & Branding
Access to a variety of prebuilt templates
Custom branding and domain controls on higher-tier plans
Firms can collaborate with Qwilr to create tailored layouts
Export & Sharing
Share via link—no login required for recipients
Tracks viewer engagement (views, time per section)
PDF export available (interactive features are lost in export)
Pricing
Business Plan
$35/month per user (billed annually)
$45/month per user (billed monthly)
Users: No minimum — starts at 1 user
Enterprise Plan
Cost: Custom pricing
User minimum: 10-seat minimum
Onboarding & Trial
14-day trial with no credit card
Onboarding tiers range from 30-day basic support to 90-day “White Glove” packages
AEC Industry Considerations
Not recommended for highly complex RFPs that require extensive input from external consultants or detailed form submissions
Best for visual, modular qualifications packages, and fee proposals
Non-marketing staff can build documents if the content is well-prepared in advance
Final Summary
Qwilr offers a polished, user-friendly platform for firms seeking visually engaging, interactive qualification materials. It works well for AEC teams with well-maintained content, but it is not designed for complex or compliance-heavy proposal work.
